Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
64 GBSM-N9005
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 87.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2013-09-04 | 2020-03-20 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.72 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Blue and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 320.00 | $ 333.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.46 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.68 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V60 ThinQ is slightly better than Galaxy Note 3, having a overall score of 87.6 against 81.1. Both devices we compare here work with Android OS, but LG V60 ThinQ has a more recent 11 version while Galaxy Note 3 has Android 5.0, so it offers some extra features. LG V60 ThinQ's body is a lot newer than the Galaxy Note 3's, although it's incredibly heavier and a little bit thicker.
The Galaxy Note 3 features a little bit better looking display than LG V60 ThinQ, although it has a little bit smaller display, a just a little lower number of pixels per inch of display and a quite lower resolution of 1920 x 1080. The LG V60 ThinQ counts with just a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because although it has doesn't have an additional GPU, it also counts with a greater amount of RAM and a greater number of cores.
LG V60 ThinQ counts with a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because it has a way higher video resolution, a bigger camera aperture to take better low-light photography and videos, a much more mega pixels back-facing camera and a lot larger back camera sensor. LG V60 ThinQ has a way bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy Note 3, because it has an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal memory.
LG V60 ThinQ counts with a very superior battery duration than Galaxy Note 3, because it has a 56 percent greater battery capacity.
LG V60 ThinQ is a bit more expensive than Galaxy Note 3, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.