Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Asus |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 | Android 12 |
| 2013-09-04 | 2022-09-19 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 6.81 x 3.03 x 0.41 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 8.43 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Space Gray |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 265.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2448 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 9000+ (4 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Mali-G710 MC10 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.46 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 3 has an overall score of 81.2, which is just a bit better than the Asus ROG Phone 6D's 79.8 global score. Both phones in our current comparison use Android OS, but the Galaxy Note 3 has older 5.0 version while Asus ROG Phone 6D has Android 12. Galaxy Note 3's body is somewhat thinner and lighter than Asus ROG Phone 6D, despite of the fact that it was released 9 years before.
The Galaxy Note 3 features a much faster processing unit than Asus ROG Phone 6D, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and 4 less processing cores , it also counts with an extra graphics processor. The Galaxy Note 3 and the Asus ROG Phone 6D both count with really similar screens, although the Asus ROG Phone 6D also has a bigger screen, a just a little better screen pixels density and a little bit higher 1080 x 2448 resolution.
The Asus ROG Phone 6D counts with a way better camera than Galaxy Note 3, because it has a back-facing camera with a lot higher resolution, a larger camera aperture to take better low-light photos, a much larger sensor and a lot higher 7680x4320 video quality. The Asus ROG Phone 6D has a much greater memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Note 3, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory.
The Asus ROG Phone 6D features a way better battery duration than Galaxy Note 3, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.