Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 76.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 | Android 15 |
| 2013-09-04 | -- |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | -- |
| 5.93 ounces | -- |
| Black, Pink and White | Obsidian and Porcelain |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 265.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 8 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | -- |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | -- |
| -- | 2700 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 4.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Google Tensor G5 (4 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.46 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | -- |
| 31.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.68 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 7.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4650mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 3 is just a bit better than the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored), with an 81.2 score against 76.7. Both phones in this comparison come with Android OS, but Galaxy Note 3 has an older 5.0 version while Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored) has Android 15. Galaxy Note 3 has a much better processing power than Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored), because although it has less RAM memory and a lower number of cores (although they are faster), it also counts with an extra graphics co-processor.
The Galaxy Note 3 has a way better looking display than Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored), although it has a lot smaller screen. Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored) features a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored) also has faster video frame rates and a camera in the back with way more megapixels.
Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored) features a way bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy Note 3, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory. Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored) counts with a very superior battery lifetime than Galaxy Note 3, because it has 4650mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.