Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 | Android 12 |
| 2013-09-04 | 2022-07-21 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 5.99 x 2.83 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | -- |
| -- | Glass, Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 265.00 | $ 449.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 431 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 7.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Tensor (5 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Mali-G78 MP20 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.46 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.68 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4410mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is a little bit better than Google Pixel 6a, having an 81.2 score against 76.4. Both of these devices have Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has older 5.0 version while Google Pixel 6a has Android 12 version. The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 construction is just a bit lighter and just a bit thinner than Google Pixel 6a, although it was released many years before.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 features a sharper screen than Google Pixel 6a, although it has a quite smaller screen, a little worse display pixel density and a bit worse resolution of 1920 x 1080. Galaxy Note 3 features a much powerful processor than Google Pixel 6a, because although it has 2 less cpu cores and a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with a graphics co-processor.
Google Pixel 6a has a bit better camera than Galaxy Note 3, because although it has a back facing camera with lesser mega-pixels and a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, it also counts with a way bigger aperture. Google Pixel 6a features a little bit more memory to store more games and applications than Galaxy Note 3, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
The Google Pixel 6a features a much longer battery duration than Galaxy Note 3, because it has a 38% more battery size.
The Galaxy Note 3 not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones, which makes it very easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.