Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 | -- |
| 2013-09-04 | 2017-02-21 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 265.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 386 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.46 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 3 is a bit better than HTC U Ultra, with a score of 81.2 against 77. Galaxy Note 3's design is just a bit lighter than the HTC U Ultra, but it is a bit thicker and was released many years before. The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 counts with just a bit better looking display than HTC U Ultra, although it has much lesser pixels per screen inch and a much lower resolution of 1920 x 1080px, they both have a display of the same size.
Galaxy Note 3 counts with a bit faster CPU than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, and they both have a Quad-Core CPU, the Galaxy Note 3 also counts with a graphics co-processor. HTC U Ultra features a way bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the HTC U Ultra also has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy Note 3 features a little better battery lifetime than HTC U Ultra, because it has 3200mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh. The HTC U Ultra features a bit better camera than Galaxy Note 3, because although it has a less mega pixels camera in the back and a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, it also counts with a bigger aperture and a lot larger sensor providing a lot higher image quality.
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 not only is the best devices between the ones we are comparing, but it's also a bargain compared to the other devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.