Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2013-09-04 | 2018-11-09 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Black and Gray |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 265.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 386 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.46 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is slightly better than the LG G7 Fit, with an 81.2 score against 77. These devices work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has an older 5.0 version while LG G7 Fit has Android 8.1 Oreo. Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is a way older, a little bit thicker and a little heavier cellphone than the LG G7 Fit.
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has a bit superior processor than LG G7 Fit, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, and they both have 4 cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note 3 also counts with an extra graphics co-processor. LG G7 Fit has just a bit better screen than Galaxy Note 3, because it has a much better resolution of 1440 x 3120px, a little bit larger screen and a better screen pixels density.
The LG G7 Fit has a very superior memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. LG G7 Fit shoots a bit better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because although it has a smaller back camera sensor, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates, a same size diafragm aperture and the same video resolution, the LG G7 Fit also counts with a camera in the back with more MP.
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 counts with a bit longer battery life than LG G7 Fit, because it has a 7 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.