Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 85.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 | Android 10 |
| 2013-09-04 | 2020-11-06 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.14 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Titan gray |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 265.00 | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 386 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.46 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.68 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG K92 is a little bit better than the Galaxy Note 3, having an 85.4 score against 81.2. These phones use Android OS (operating system), but the LG K92 has a newer 10 version and Galaxy Note 3 has Android 5.0 version. The LG K92 design has the same thickness than Galaxy Note 3, but it's heavier.
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 counts with a more vivid screen than LG K92, although it has a quite smaller screen, a little lower resolution of 1920 x 1080 and a just a bit inferior quantity of pixels per inch in the display. LG K92 counts with a much better storage for games and applications than Galaxy Note 3, because it has a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal memory.
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has a little bit better performance than LG K92, because although it has a lower amount of RAM and an inferior number of cores (although they are faster), it also counts with a GPU. The LG K92 counts with a way better camera than Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the LG K92 also has a much more mega-pixels back facing camera, a bigger camera aperture for better low-light captures and a much larger back-facing camera sensor.
LG K92 has superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because it has a 25 percent greater battery capacity.
Although LG K92 is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Samsung Galaxy Note 3, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Samsung Galaxy Note 3. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy LG K92, otherwise you can save some dollars and buy the Samsung Galaxy Note 3, giving up a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.