Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 76.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 | Android 10 |
| 2013-09-04 | 2020-05-20 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 6.75 x 3.06 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Holographic white |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 265.00 | $ 233.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 386 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.46 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.68 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 3 has an overall score of 81.2, which is a bit better than LG Stylo 6's 76.7 score. Despite of the fact that Galaxy Note 3 is way older than LG Stylo 6, it's construction is a little bit thinner and noticeably lighter. These phones have Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Note 3 has an older 5.0 version while LG Stylo 6 has Android 10 version.
The LG Stylo 6 counts with a processing unit that's very similar to the processor in Galaxy Note 3, because although the LG Stylo 6 has doesn't have an additional graphics processing unit, it also counts with a higher number of cores and a higher amount of RAM. The Galaxy Note 3 features a little more vivid screen than LG Stylo 6, although it has a quite smaller screen, a bit lower 1920 x 1080 resolution and a little bit inferior quantity of pixels per inch of screen.
The LG Stylo 6 counts with much more storage to install applications and games than Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the LG Stylo 6 also has a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB. The LG Stylo 6 has superior battery duration than Galaxy Note 3, because it has a 25% greater battery capacity.
Galaxy Note 3 features a bit better camera than LG Stylo 6, because although it has a tinier camera sensor shooting worse quality photographs and videos and a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for low light photography and videos, and they both have a same resolution back facing camera, the Galaxy Note 3 also counts with a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
The Galaxy Note 3 costs a bit more money than the LG Stylo 6, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.