Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 87.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2013-09-04 | 2020-03-20 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.72 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Blue and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 265.00 | $ 333.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.46 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.68 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V60 ThinQ has a global score of 87.6, which is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy Note 3's global score of 81.2. Both of these phones work with Android OS (operating system), but the LG V60 ThinQ has newer 11 version while Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has Android 5.0 version, giving lots of additional features and increased performance. The LG V60 ThinQ body is incredibly newer, but notably heavier and a little thicker than the Samsung Galaxy Note 3.
The Galaxy Note 3 has a little more vivid display than LG V60 ThinQ, although it has a little smaller display, a quite lower resolution of 1920 x 1080 and a just a bit worse screen pixels density. LG V60 ThinQ counts with a superior storage capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because it has an external memory card slot that allows up to 1,95 TB and more internal storage.
The LG V60 ThinQ counts with just a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processing unit, it also counts with a greater number of cores and a higher amount of RAM. The LG V60 ThinQ counts with a way better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3200mAh.
LG V60 ThinQ shoots clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy Note 3, because it has a larger aperture, a much better video definition, a much higher 64 megapixels resolution back facing camera and a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing way higher quality videos and pictures.
The LG V60 ThinQ is more expensive than Galaxy Note 3, but it's still a good choice, as you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.