Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 | Android 14 |
| 2013-09-04 | 2024-06-20 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 6.28 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Black |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 265.00 | $ 549.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 SM7435-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 710 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.46 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.68 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is just a bit better than the Motorola Edge (2024), with a overall score of 81.2 against 78.5. Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is a way older and just a bit thicker phone than the Motorola Edge (2024), but Samsung was able to build it a little lighter anyway. These phones include Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has older 5.0 version and Motorola Edge (2024) has Android 14.
The Motorola Edge (2024) has a little more vivid screen than Galaxy Note 3, because it has a bit greater pixels number in each display inch, a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a bigger screen. Galaxy Note 3 counts with a way better hardware performance than Motorola Edge (2024), because although it has 4 lesser CPU cores (but faster) and a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with an extra GPU.
Motorola Edge (2024) has a very superior storage to store more games and applications than Galaxy Note 3, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. Motorola Edge (2024) has a very superior battery duration than Galaxy Note 3, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 3200mAh.
The Motorola Edge (2024) captures slightly better photos and videos than Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Motorola Edge (2024) also has a back-facing camera with a much better resolution, a lot bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a larger aperture.
In addition to being the best phone in this comparison, Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is also a bargain compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.