Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 | Android 12 |
| 2013-09-04 | 2022-09-08 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 6.02 x 2.80 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.47 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Aqua Foam, Black Onyx, Ice Palace and Very Peri |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 265.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 418 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 (6 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.46 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.68 | 11.33 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4020mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 30 Neo has a score of 83.1, which is a little bit better than Galaxy Note 3's global score of 81.2. Both of these phones use Android OS (operating system), but Motorola Edge 30 Neo has 12 version while Galaxy Note 3 has Android 5.0, counting with a couple additional features and performance tweaks. Motorola Edge 30 Neo's construction is noticeably newer, a bit lighter and just a little bit thinner than Galaxy Note 3.
Galaxy Note 3 has a little bit better screen than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, although it has a little bit smaller display, a little bit lower 1920 x 1080 resolution and a little lower pixel count per inch in the display. The Motorola Edge 30 Neo counts with a slightly bigger memory to install applications and games than Galaxy Note 3, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory.
The Motorola Edge 30 Neo features a processing unit that is very similar to Galaxy Note 3's processing unit, because although the Motorola Edge 30 Neo has doesn't have an extra graphics processor, it also counts with a larger amount of RAM and a greater number of cores. The Motorola Edge 30 Neo counts with superior battery life than Galaxy Note 3, because it has a 26 percent greater battery size.
The Motorola Edge 30 Neo captures much clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution, the Motorola Edge 30 Neo also has a much higher 64 megapixels resolution camera, higher 120 fps video frame rate and a larger diafragm aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.