Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 | Android 12 |
| 2013-09-04 | 2022-09-08 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 6.37 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.00 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Interstellar Black and Starlight White |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 265.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1250 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.46 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.82 inches (1/1.22") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 14.96 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 3 is slightly better than the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, getting an 81.2 score against 80.9. Galaxy Note 3 is a lighter phone than the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, but both are 0.33inches thick. Both of these devices include Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy Note 3 has the older 5.0 version while Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has Android 12 version.
Galaxy Note 3 features a much greater performance than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because although it has 5 GB lesser RAM memory, it also counts with more CPU cores and an additional graphics co-processor. Motorola Edge 30 Ultra features a screen that's just as good as the display in Galaxy Note 3, although the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra also has a larger display, a bit greater number of pixels in each screen inch and a little bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution.
The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra features a bit more memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy Note 3, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra features a greater camera than Galaxy Note 3, because it has a much higher 7680x4320 video definition, a way more MP camera, a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low light photography and videos and a way bigger sensor.
The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has a superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because it has a 56 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.