Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 81.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 | Android 10 |
| 2013-09-04 | 2020-12-07 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Frosted silver and Volcanic grey |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 265.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | LTPS |
| 386 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.46 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto G 5G is slightly better than Galaxy Note 3, with a global score of 81.5 against 81.2. Motorola Moto G 5G's body is a lot newer than Galaxy Note 3's, although it's extremely heavier and thicker. These phones work with Android operating system, but Motorola Moto G 5G has 10 version and Galaxy Note 3 has Android 5.0, offering lots of additional features.
Galaxy Note 3 counts with a better display than Motorola Moto G 5G, although it has a little smaller display, a bit lower 1920 x 1080px resolution and a bit lower pixels density. Moto G 5G features a way bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory, the Moto G 5G also has an external memory slot that admits up to 1000 GB.
The Galaxy Note 3 features a bit better CPU than Moto G 5G, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and less cores (although faster), it also counts with an additional graphics processor. Motorola Moto G 5G takes much better photos and videos than Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Motorola Moto G 5G also has a way larger aperture to take better low-light photos and a lot better 48 megapixels resolution back facing camera.
Motorola Moto G 5G has a really longer battery life than Galaxy Note 3, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.