Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 | -- |
| 2013-09-04 | 2020-07-08 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Surfing blue |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 265.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | LCD |
| 386 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.46 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto G 5G Plus is a little bit better than the Galaxy Note 3, with a general score of 82.6 against 81.2. Even though Motorola Moto G 5G Plus is a lot newer than Galaxy Note 3, it's heavier and just a little bit thicker. The Moto G 5G Plus's CPU is just as good as the processor in Galaxy Note 3, because although the Moto G 5G Plus has doesn't have an extra graphics processing unit, it also counts with 1 GB more RAM and more cpu cores.
Galaxy Note 3 features a bit more vivid screen than Motorola Moto G 5G Plus, although it has a bit smaller display, a bit lower 1920 x 1080 pixels resolution and a bit less pixels per inch in the screen. Moto G 5G Plus features a better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same video frame rate, the Moto G 5G Plus also has a much larger aperture to take better low-light images, a back-facing camera with a lot better 48 mega pixels resolution and a way bigger back-facing camera sensor.
Moto G 5G Plus has a very superior storage to store more games and applications than Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Moto G 5G Plus also has a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. The Motorola Moto G 5G Plus features a much better battery duration than Galaxy Note 3, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.