Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 | -- |
| 2013-09-04 | 2021-01-14 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 6.69 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Aurora black and Aurora white |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 265.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 386 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 SM6150-AC chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.46 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 3 is just a bit better than the Moto G Stylus (2021), with an 81.2 score against 79.3. Galaxy Note 3's design is a bit thinner and way lighter than Moto G Stylus (2021), even though it was released many years before. Galaxy Note 3 has a little bit better processing power than Moto G Stylus (2021), because although it has 4 less cores and a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a graphics processing unit.
Galaxy Note 3 features a sharper display than Moto G Stylus (2021), although it has a little bit less pixels per inch in the display, a little bit worse 1920 x 1080 resolution and a little smaller screen. The Moto G Stylus (2021) shoots much clearer videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Moto G Stylus (2021) also has a lot more mega pixels back-facing camera and a way larger diafragm aperture.
Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021) features a much bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 512 GB. The Moto G Stylus (2021) counts with superior battery duration than Galaxy Note 3, because it has a 25 percent greater battery size.
Even being the best phone in our current comparison, Galaxy Note 3 is also cheaper than the Moto G Stylus (2021), which makes it an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.