Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 | Android 13 |
| 2013-09-04 | 2023-06-02 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 6.41 x 2.91 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Cosmic Black and Rose Champagne |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 265.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 386 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 SM6450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 600 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.46 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.68 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | -- |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 3 has a score of 81.2, which is a bit better than the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023)'s global score of 76. Both of these devices work with Android OS, but the Galaxy Note 3 has the older 5.0 version while Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) has Android 13 version. The Galaxy Note 3 is an noticeably older phone than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), but it is lighter and a little thinner anyway.
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has a better screen than Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), although it has a bit worse 1920 x 1080px resolution, a little inferior amount of pixels per display inch and a bit smaller display. The Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) counts with a lot bigger storage to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has an extremely better CPU than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), because although it has a lower number of cores and lesser RAM, it also counts with an extra GPU. The Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) has a much better camera than Galaxy Note 3, because although it has a much smaller back-facing camera sensor which provides a lot lower image and video quality, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same video frame rate, the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) also counts with a camera with lot more mega pixels and a bigger camera aperture to take better photography and video in low-light environments.
Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) features a very superior battery life than Galaxy Note 3, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.