Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 88.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 | Android 11 |
| 2013-09-04 | 2021-04-15 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 6.63 x 2.91 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Iridescent Ocean, Iridescent Sky and Slate Grey |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 265.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 386 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G SM8250-AC chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.46 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 5760 x 3240 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Moto G100 has a global score of 88.9, which is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy Note 3's overall score of 81.2. Both of these phones include Android operating system, but Moto G100 has the newer 11 version and Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has Android 5.0 version, so it gives lots of additional features. Moto G100's design is way newer than Samsung Galaxy Note 3's, but it's heavier and somewhat thicker.
The Moto G100 features a bit better processor than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processing unit, it also counts with 4 more cpu cores and more RAM. The Galaxy Note 3 counts with a slightly better looking display than Moto G100, although it has a just a little lower display pixel density, a little smaller display and a bit lower resolution of 1920 x 1080px.
Motorola Moto G100 counts with a much better camera than Galaxy Note 3, because it has a back camera with lot more mega-pixels, a much bigger sensor providing a lot better image quality, a lot bigger diafragm aperture to take better photography and videos in low-light environments and a lot better video resolution.
Moto G100 counts with a lot bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Note 3, because it has more internal storage capacity and an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB. Moto G100 counts with a much better battery life than Galaxy Note 3, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.