Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 | Android 11 |
| 2013-09-04 | 2021-11-18 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Glacier Green and Stellar Blue |
| -- | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 265.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 386 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.46 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.68 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto G200 5G has a general score of 86.2, which is a little bit better than Galaxy Note 3's general score of 81.2. These phones come with Android operating system, but the Motorola Moto G200 5G has a more recent 11 version and Galaxy Note 3 has Android 5.0, so it offers a lot of extra features. The Motorola Moto G200 5G body is incredibly newer, but heavier and just a bit thicker than the Galaxy Note 3.
Motorola Moto G200 5G counts with a little better performance than Galaxy Note 3, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processor, it also counts with 4 more cores and 5 GB more RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has a little bit better looking screen than Motorola Moto G200 5G, although it has a bit smaller display, a quite lower 1920 x 1080px resolution and a little less pixels per inch of display.
Motorola Moto G200 5G features a way better camera than Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Motorola Moto G200 5G also has a back camera with a much higher 108 MP resolution and a larger diafragm aperture for better images and video in low-light environments.
Moto G200 5G features a slightly bigger storage for apps and games than Galaxy Note 3, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. Moto G200 5G features a much longer battery duration than Galaxy Note 3, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.