Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 | -- |
| 2013-09-04 | 2021-02-16 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Pastel sky and Phantom black |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 265.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 386 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.46 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.68 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.4 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 3 is a little bit better than Moto G30, getting a global score of 81.2 against 78.1. Although the Galaxy Note 3 is older than Moto G30, it's construction is a bit thinner and lighter. Galaxy Note 3 has a much sharper display than Moto G30, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the display and a better resolution of 1920 x 1080.
Moto G30 has a superior storage capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because it has a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 512 GB and 128 GB internal storage capacity. Galaxy Note 3 counts with a bit better performance than Moto G30, because although it has 4 less processing cores (although they are faster) and a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with an extra graphics co-processor.
The Motorola Moto G30 features a really longer battery life than Galaxy Note 3, because it has a 56 percent larger battery capacity. Moto G30 counts with a much better camera than Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same video definition, the Moto G30 also has faster video frame rates, a back-facing camera with lot more megapixels and a lot larger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.