Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 | Android 11 |
| 2013-09-04 | 2021-12-06 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 6.37 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.38 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Baby Blue and Mineral Grey |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 265.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 386 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | MediaTek Helio G85 MT6769Z (12 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Cortex, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.46 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.68 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is a bit better than Moto G31, with a general score of 81.2 against 77. Both devices we compare here come with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has the previous 5.0 version and Moto G31 has Android 11 version. Samsung Galaxy Note 3's construction is just a bit lighter and just a little thinner than Moto G31, despite of the fact that it was released many years before.
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 features a bit better processing unit than Moto G31, because although it has lesser RAM and an inferior number of cores (although they are faster), it also counts with an additional graphics processing unit. The Galaxy Note 3 has a little more vivid display than Moto G31, although it has a quite inferior pixels count per display inch, a quite smaller display and a bit lower resolution of 1920 x 1080.
The Moto G31 features a slightly better camera than Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 1920x1080 video definition, the Moto G31 also has a bigger aperture for better images in low-light situations and a way better resolution back facing camera. The Moto G31 counts with a superior memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory, the Moto G31 also has an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB.
The Motorola Moto G31 has a much better battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.