Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 79.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 | Android 11 |
| 2013-09-04 | 2022-01-28 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 6.37 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Meteorite Black and Pearl Gold |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 265.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 386 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | MediaTek Helio G85 MT6769Z (12 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Cortex, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.46 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.68 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 3 has a score of 81.2, which is just a bit better than Moto G41's 79.1 general score. Both phones in this comparison review include Android operating system, but the Galaxy Note 3 has the previous 5.0 version while Moto G41 has Android 11. Galaxy Note 3 is a just a little lighter cellphone than the Moto G41, but both of them have the same thickness.
The Galaxy Note 3 counts with just a bit better performance than Moto G41, because although it has lesser RAM and a lower number of cores (but faster), it also counts with an additional graphics co-processor. The Galaxy Note 3 features a slightly better looking screen than Motorola Moto G41, although it has a little worse resolution of 1920 x 1080px, a little inferior pixels amount per screen inch and a quite smaller display.
Moto G41 has a very superior storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy Note 3, because it has more internal storage and a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 1 TB. Motorola Moto G41 features just a bit better camera than Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition, the Motorola Moto G41 also has a much more MP camera in the back and a way larger aperture.
Motorola Moto G41 has a much better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because it has a 56% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.