Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 | Android 11 |
| 2013-09-04 | 2021-12-20 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 6.71 x 3.01 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Aqua Blue, Bright Silver and Indigo Blue |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 265.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 386 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 (8 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.46 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.68 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is just a bit better than Moto G51 5G, having a score of 81.2 against 77.8. Both of these phones work with Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has older 5.0 version while Moto G51 5G has Android 11. Samsung Galaxy Note 3's body is somewhat lighter and a little bit thinner than Moto G51 5G, despite of the fact that it was released 8 years before.
The Galaxy Note 3 features a sharper screen than Moto G51 5G, although it has a quite smaller display, a bit lower resolution of 1920 x 1080 and a little worse pixels amount in each inch of display. The Galaxy Note 3 features a bit superior processing unit than Moto G51 5G, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and less cpu cores , it also counts with a graphics processing unit.
Moto G51 5G takes better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 video definition, the Moto G51 5G also has better video frame rates, a back camera with much more MP and a larger aperture to take better low-light photos and video. The Motorola Moto G51 5G has a superior storage capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Motorola Moto G51 5G also has a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
The Moto G51 5G has a superior battery performance than Galaxy Note 3, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.