Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 | Android 11 |
| 2013-09-04 | 2021-04-27 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.94 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Dynamic Grey and Frosted Champagne |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 265.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 386 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2230 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.46 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (360 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 3 has a global score of 81.2, which is a bit better than Moto G60's overall score of 79.5. The Galaxy Note 3 is an a lot older cellphone than Moto G60, but Samsung was able to build it noticeably lighter and thinner anyway. Both devices in our current comparison come with Android operating system, but Galaxy Note 3 has the older 5.0 version while Moto G60 has Android 11 version.
Motorola Moto G60 has a CPU that's just as good as the Samsung Galaxy Note 3 one, because although the Motorola Moto G60 has doesn't have an additional GPU, it also counts with 1 GB more RAM and a greater number of cores. The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 features a brighter display than Moto G60, although it has a little lower screen density, a little smaller screen and a bit lower resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels.
Moto G60 features a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage, the Moto G60 also has a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 1 TB. The Moto G60 takes greater pictures and videos than Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video resolution, the Moto G60 also has a back camera with a much higher 108 mega-pixels resolution and a bigger diafragm aperture for better low-light photos and video.
The Moto G60 counts with a superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because it has an 88 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.