Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 | Android 11 |
| 2013-09-04 | -- |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Iced Mint and Ink Blue |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 265.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 386 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | MediaTek Helio G95 MT6785V/CD chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Mali-G76 MC4 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.46 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.68 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has an overall score of 81.2, which is a bit better than Moto G60s's 79.9 score. These devices come with Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has the previous 5.0 version and Moto G60s has Android 11. The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 body is noticeably lighter and somewhat thinner than the Moto G60s.
The Galaxy Note 3 has a more vivid screen than Moto G60s, although it has a just a bit lower pixels count per inch in the display, a little bit lower 1920 x 1080 resolution and a quite smaller display. Samsung Galaxy Note 3 features a little better hardware performance than Moto G60s, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM and an inferior number of cores (although they are faster), it also counts with a graphics processor.
The Motorola Moto G60s shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video definition, the Motorola Moto G60s also has a back camera with lot more megapixels and a much larger camera aperture. Moto G60s counts with a much bigger storage for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because it has a SD extension slot that supports up to 1 TB and more internal memory.
Moto G60s features a very superior battery performance than Galaxy Note 3, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.