Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 | Android 13 |
| 2013-09-04 | 2023-09-14 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | -- |
| Black, Pink and White | Marshmallow Blue, Midnight Blue and Viva Magenta |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 265.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G SM6375 (6 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.46 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.68 | 11.33 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | -- |
| 7.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has a global score of 81.2, which is a little bit better than the Moto G84's global score of 80.9. Both phones in this comparison use Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has the previous 5.0 version while Moto G84 has Android 13 version. The Moto G84 features just a bit better looking screen than Galaxy Note 3, because it has a little bit greater display density, a little bit bigger screen and a bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution.
The Galaxy Note 3 counts with a much greater hardware performance than Moto G84, because although it has lesser RAM and less cpu cores (but faster), it also counts with a GPU. The Motorola Moto G84 shoots much better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution, the Motorola Moto G84 also has a camera with way more megapixels, a way larger camera sensor which gives a lot better photo and video quality, higher video frame rates and a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better captures and video in low light environments.
Motorola Moto G84 has much more storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy Note 3, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. Moto G84 features a very superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.