Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 76.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 | Android 10 |
| 2013-09-04 | 2020-08-28 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Forest green and Sapphire blue |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 265.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 386 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.46 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.68 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 3 has a score of 81.2, which is just a bit better than the Motorola Moto G9 Play's general score of 76.7. These devices use Android operating system, but Galaxy Note 3 has older 5.0 version while Motorola Moto G9 Play has Android 10 version. Despite of the fact that Galaxy Note 3 is a lot older than Motorola Moto G9 Play, it's design is somewhat lighter and a little bit thinner.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has a little faster processor than Motorola Moto G9 Play, because although it has lesser RAM and an inferior number of cores (but faster), it also counts with a graphics processor. Galaxy Note 3 counts with a much more vibrant screen than Motorola Moto G9 Play, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1920 x 1080px and a greater count of pixels per inch in the display.
The Moto G9 Play has a superior memory to install applications and games than Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Moto G9 Play also has a SD memory slot that supports up to 512 GB. The Moto G9 Play counts with a way better battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 3200mAh.
Motorola Moto G9 Play has a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same video quality, the Motorola Moto G9 Play also has a way larger diafragm aperture to take better photos in low-light environments, higher 60 frames per second video frame rate, a way bigger back camera sensor which provides a way better image and video quality and a back facing camera with a much higher 48 mega-pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.