Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 80.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 | Android 10 |
| 2013-09-04 | 2020-09-07 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 6.69 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.88 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Blush gold and Navy blue |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 265.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 386 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.46 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has an overall score of 81.2, which is just a bit better than the Motorola Moto G9 Plus's score of 80.5. Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is an older device than Motorola Moto G9 Plus, but Samsung could make it thinner and a lot lighter anyway. Both of these devices use Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has the older 5.0 version and Motorola Moto G9 Plus has Android 10.
The Galaxy Note 3 has a much better display than Moto G9 Plus, although it has a little lower pixel density, a bit lower resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels and a little smaller display. Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has a bit more powerful processor than Moto G9 Plus, because although it has less CPU cores and lesser RAM memory, it also counts with an additional GPU.
Motorola Moto G9 Plus shoots way better photos and videos than Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Motorola Moto G9 Plus also has a bigger camera aperture to take better low light photography and video, a way bigger camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality and a lot more megapixels back facing camera.
Moto G9 Plus features much more memory capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because it has 64 GB more internal memory capacity and a SD extension slot that admits up to 512 GB. Motorola Moto G9 Plus has a really longer battery lifetime than Galaxy Note 3, because it has a 56 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.