Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 78.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 | Android 10 |
| 2013-09-04 | 2020-12-05 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 6.78 x 3.02 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.80 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Electric violet and Metallic sage |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 265.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 1640 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 386 pixels per inch | 263 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.46 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.68 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 3 has a global score of 81.2, which is just a bit better than the Moto G9 Power's general score of 78.6. Galaxy Note 3 is an older cellphone than the Moto G9 Power, but Samsung was able to make it somewhat thinner and much lighter anyway. Both phones we compare here work with Android OS, but Galaxy Note 3 has 5.0 version and Moto G9 Power has Android 10 version.
The Galaxy Note 3 features a much more vibrant screen than Motorola Moto G9 Power, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1920 x 1080px and a higher pixels amount per inch in the screen. Samsung Galaxy Note 3 counts with just a little better processing power than Moto G9 Power, because although it has 1 GB lesser RAM memory and a lower number of cores (although they are faster), it also counts with an extra graphics processor.
Moto G9 Power takes better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition, the Moto G9 Power also has a way better 64 megapixels resolution back-facing camera, a larger camera aperture to capture better low light captures and video and faster video frame rate.
Motorola Moto G9 Power counts with a much better storage capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy Note 3, because it has an external memory card slot that admits up to 512 GB and more internal storage capacity. Motorola Moto G9 Power counts with a superior battery lifetime than Galaxy Note 3, because it has an 88 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.