Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 74.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 | -- |
| 2013-09-04 | 2017-10-19 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 5.84 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Black and Blue |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 265.00 | $ 270.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 386 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 508 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.46 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 3 is just a bit better than Motorola Moto X4, with a global score of 81.2 against 74.4. Although the Galaxy Note 3 is better than the Motorola Moto X4, it must be noted that it's also a lot older, a little bit thicker and just a little bit heavier. The Galaxy Note 3 features just a bit better processing power than Moto X4, because although it has an inferior number of cores , and they both have a 3 GB RAM memory, the Galaxy Note 3 also counts with a graphics co-processor.
The Galaxy Note 3 features a little bit better display than Moto X4, because although it has a bit inferior amount of pixels per display inch, and they both have the same exact 1920 x 1080 resolution, the Galaxy Note 3 also counts with a little bit larger screen. The Moto X4 counts with a much bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because although it has just 32 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Moto X4 features a slightly better camera than Galaxy Note 3, because although it has a worse video definition and a back facing camera with a lower 12 megapixels resolution, it also counts with a larger camera sensor shooting better quality photos and a larger diafragm aperture. The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 counts with just a little better battery lifetime than Motorola Moto X4, because it has a 3200mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Galaxy Note 3 not only is the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also cheap compared to the Moto X4, making this phone an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.