Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2013-09-04 | 2016-09-01 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 265.00 | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.46 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 3 has a global score of 81.2, which is just a bit better than Motorola Moto Z Force's overall score of 75.8. Despite being the best in this review, Galaxy Note 3 is a noticeably older, just a bit heavier and somewhat thicker cellphone than Motorola Moto Z Force. These phones use Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy Note 3 has older 5.0 version while Motorola Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat version.
The Galaxy Note 3 counts with a bit better screen than Moto Z Force, because although it has a much lower pixels number per inch in the screen and a much lower 1920 x 1080 pixels resolution, it also counts with a little bit bigger screen. Moto Z Force counts with a very superior storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Moto Z Force also has a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Galaxy Note 3 has a bit better processing power than Motorola Moto Z Force, because although it has 1 GB less RAM, and they both have 4 cpu cores, the Galaxy Note 3 also counts with an extra GPU. The Moto Z Force features just a little bit longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity against 3200mAh.
The Moto Z Force features a slightly better camera than Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Moto Z Force also has a larger aperture and a lot better 21 megapixels resolution back-facing camera.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 costs a little more money than the Moto Z Force, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.