Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 | -- |
| 2013-09-04 | 2017-08-10 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 265.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.46 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2730mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 3 has a general score of 81.2, which is just a bit better than the Moto Z2 Force Edition's general score of 77.4. Although it's the best we compare here, it must be told that it's also way older, somewhat heavier and notably thicker. The Moto Z2 Force Edition features a little bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processing unit, it also counts with more cores and a higher amount of RAM.
Galaxy Note 3 has a little more vivid screen than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because although it has a much worse count of pixels in each inch of display and a lot worse 1920 x 1080 resolution, it also counts with a bit larger screen. Moto Z2 Force Edition features a much bigger memory for apps and games than Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Moto Z2 Force Edition also has a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has longer battery performance than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 3200mAh battery size. The Galaxy Note 3 takes clearer photographs and videos than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for low light captures and video and a smaller sensor capturing worse quality photos and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy Note 3 also counts with a better 13 megapixels resolution back facing camera.
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is not only the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to the other phones, making it very easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.