Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2013-09-04 | 2018-08-16 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 265.00 | $ 297.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.46 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 3 has a general score of 81.2, which is just a bit better than Motorola Moto Z3's overall score of 77.6. Both devices in this comparison review have Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy Note 3 has an older 5.0 version and Motorola Moto Z3 has Android 9.0 Pie. Galaxy Note 3 is better than Motorola Moto Z3, it must be noted that it is also a way older, a little heavier and somewhat thicker phone.
Moto Z3 features a little faster processing unit than Galaxy Note 3, because although it has doesn't have an extra GPU, it also counts with 4 more CPU cores and a higher amount of RAM. The Galaxy Note 3 has a little sharper display than Moto Z3, although it has a little bit smaller screen, a just a little inferior pixel count in each display inch and a quite lower 1920 x 1080 pixels resolution.
The Galaxy Note 3 shoots a little bit better photographs and videos than Moto Z3, because although it has a tinier sensor and a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Galaxy Note 3 also counts with a higher 13 megapixels resolution back-facing camera.
Moto Z3 has a much greater storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Moto Z3 also has an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. Galaxy Note 3 counts with a bit superior battery life than Moto Z3, because it has a 3200mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is also cheap compared to the other phone.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.