Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 | -- |
| 2013-09-04 | 2019-08-16 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Denim blue and Pearl white |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 265.00 | $ 304.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 386 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.46 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has a general score of 81.2, which is just a bit better than Motorola One Action's global score of 78.5. Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is an incredibly older phone than Motorola One Action, but it's just a bit thinner and just a little bit lighter anyway. Galaxy Note 3 features a bit better processing unit than Motorola One Action, because although it has lesser CPU cores (although faster) and a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with an extra graphics processing unit.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 features a little sharper screen than Motorola One Action, although it has a little lower pixel density, a little worse resolution of 1920 x 1080 and a quite smaller display. Galaxy Note 3 features a bit better camera than Motorola One Action, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for taking photographs or video in low-light situations, and they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy Note 3 also counts with a back facing camera with a better 13 mega-pixels resolution.
Motorola One Action features a much bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy Note 3, because it has a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 1000 GB and 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Motorola One Action counts with a bit better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity.
The Galaxy Note 3 not only is the best devices between the ones we are comparing, but it's also the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.