Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2013-09-04 | 2019-12-04 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 265.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 386 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.46 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has a global score of 81.2, which is slightly better than Motorola One Hyper's general score of 79.8. These phones have Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has the older 5.0 version and Motorola One Hyper has Android 11 version. Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is an noticeably older cellphone than the Motorola One Hyper, but it is a little bit thinner and somewhat lighter anyway.
Galaxy Note 3 features a bit better performance than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has less RAM memory and 4 lesser processing cores , it also counts with an additional GPU. The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 features a more vivid screen than Motorola One Hyper, although it has a little bit smaller display, a quite lower resolution of 1920 x 1080px and a just a little worse screen pixel density.
The Motorola One Hyper counts with a better camera than Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Motorola One Hyper also has a way more MP camera and a bigger aperture for better low light images. The Motorola One Hyper features a way bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB.
Motorola One Hyper counts with improved battery performance than Galaxy Note 3, because it has a 25 percent bigger battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, Galaxy Note 3 is also a lot cheaper, making it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.