Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 | -- |
| 2013-09-04 | 2019-05-15 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Blue and Brown |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 265.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 386 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.46 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has a general score of 81.2, which is a little bit better than Motorola One Vision's global score of 80.7. Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is an a lot older cellphone than Motorola One Vision, but it's just a bit lighter and just a bit thinner anyway. The Galaxy Note 3 has a little faster processor than Motorola One Vision, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and an inferior number of cores , it also counts with an extra graphics processor.
The Galaxy Note 3 features a little more vivid display than Motorola One Vision, although it has a little bit worse resolution of 1920 x 1080, a little bit smaller screen and a just a bit worse pixels number per inch in the screen. Motorola One Vision features a much better memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy Note 3, because it has more internal memory and a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 512 GB.
The Motorola One Vision has a little better battery lifetime than Galaxy Note 3, because it has a 9 percent bigger battery capacity. The Motorola One Vision shoots better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video resolution, the Motorola One Vision also has a back facing camera with way more mega-pixels, a lot larger camera aperture and a much larger back camera sensor which gives a lot better image and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.