Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 | Android 12 |
| 2013-09-04 | 2022-08-18 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 6.57 x 3.14 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | -- |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 265.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.46 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 5.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is slightly better than the Motorola razr (2022), getting a score of 81.2 against 81.1. Although the Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is incredibly older and just a little thicker than the Motorola razr (2022), it's design is still lighter. Both of these devices have Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has older 5.0 version while Motorola razr (2022) has Android 12 version.
Motorola razr (2022) counts with a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processor, it also counts with a greater number of faster cores and 5 GB more RAM. Galaxy Note 3 has a bit sharper screen than Motorola razr (2022), although it has a just a bit lower display density, a bit worse resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels and a little smaller display.
The Motorola razr (2022) has a better camera than Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video definition, the Motorola razr (2022) also has a larger aperture to capture better images and video in poorly lited environments and a way more MP back-facing camera.
The Motorola razr (2022) has a slightly better storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 64 GB more internal memory capacity. The Motorola razr (2022) features a little longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because it has a 3500mAh battery size instead of 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.