Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 | Android 15 |
| 2013-09-04 | 2025-04-24 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | -- |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 265.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | -- |
| Super AMOLED | LTPO |
| 386 pixels per inch | -- |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 5.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 830 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.46 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 7.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 3 is a little bit better than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), with a score of 81.2 against 79.2. These phones work with Android OS, but Galaxy Note 3 has 5.0 version and Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has Android 15. Galaxy Note 3 counts with a much sharper display than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a little bit smaller display.
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with a much bigger memory for apps and games than Galaxy Note 3, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity. Galaxy Note 3 has a much faster processing unit than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and an inferior number of cores (but faster), it also counts with an extra graphics co-processor.
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features a really longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) takes way better videos and photos than Galaxy Note 3, because it has a larger aperture, a way higher 7680x4320 video quality and a much more MP camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.