Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 80.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Nokia |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 | Android 11 |
| 2013-09-04 | 2021-07-29 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 10.02 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Granite Gre and Ultra Blue |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 265.00 | $ 550.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | -- |
| 386 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 460 Gold, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.46 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.68 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4630mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 3 has a global score of 81.2, which is just a bit better than the Nokia XR20's global score of 80.8. The Galaxy Note 3 body is noticeably thinner and noticeably lighter than the Nokia XR20, despite of the fact that it was released many years before. Both of these phones include Android operating system, but the Galaxy Note 3 has the previous 5.0 version and Nokia XR20 has Android 11 version.
Galaxy Note 3 counts with a little more vivid screen than Nokia XR20, although it has a quite worse amount of pixels per inch in the display, a bit lower resolution of 1920 x 1080 and a little bit smaller display. The Nokia XR20 has a much better memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Note 3, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 512 GB.
The Galaxy Note 3 features a bit better processor than Nokia XR20, because although it has 4 less cpu cores and a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with an extra graphics co-processor. The Nokia XR20 has a really longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because it has a 45 percent greater battery capacity.
Nokia XR20 features a much better camera than Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same (Full HD) video quality, the Nokia XR20 also has a much more megapixels camera, a bigger camera aperture to capture better photos in poorly lited environments, better video frame rates and a lot larger back camera sensor.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, the Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is also a lot cheaper, which makes it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.