Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | OnePlus |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 | Android 10 |
| 2013-09-04 | 2019-12-06 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 6.40 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.41 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Papaya orange |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 265.00 | $ 432.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 513 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.46 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | 17.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4085mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has a score of 81.2, which is a little bit better than the OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren's 80.1 score. Both of these phones include Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has the older 5.0 version while OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren has Android 10 version. Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is an a lot older cellphone than OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren, but Samsung made it just a little bit thinner and somewhat lighter anyway.
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 counts with a little sharper display than OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren, although it has a way worse resolution of 1920 x 1080, a bit smaller screen and a quite worse quantity of pixels per inch in the screen. The OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren counts with a little bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because although it has doesn't have a GPU, it also counts with 4 more processing cores and a larger amount of RAM memory.
OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren features a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren also has a way bigger camera aperture for better photography and video in low light situations, faster video frame rates, a lot bigger sensor shooting much better quality photographs and videos and a way better resolution camera.
The OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren has a lot bigger memory to store more games and applications than Galaxy Note 3, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren has better battery lifetime than Galaxy Note 3, because it has 4085mAh of battery capacity against 3200mAh.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, the Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.