Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 | Android 10 |
| 2013-09-04 | 2020-05-21 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 6.28 x 2.85 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Moonlight Black and Starry Blue |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 265.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.46 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 3 is slightly better than the OPPO Find X2 Neo, with a score of 81.2 against 77.7. Both of these devices work with Android OS, but the Galaxy Note 3 has the older 5.0 version and OPPO Find X2 Neo has Android 10. Even though the Galaxy Note 3 is extremely older and just a bit thicker than OPPO Find X2 Neo, it's construction is still just a little bit lighter.
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 features a little sharper screen than OPPO Find X2 Neo, although it has a quite smaller screen, a bit worse pixel density and a bit worse resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels. The OPPO Find X2 Neo counts with a superior memory to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with more internal memory.
The OPPO Find X2 Neo has just a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processor, it also counts with 9 GB more RAM memory and a higher number of cores. OPPO Find X2 Neo has improved battery performance than Galaxy Note 3, because it has 4025mAh of battery capacity.
The OPPO Find X2 Neo shoots greater photographs and videos than Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also has a much bigger aperture, a way more mega-pixels camera in the back and a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.