Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 | Android 11 |
| 2013-09-04 | 2021-04-14 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Galactic Silver and Starlight Black |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 265.00 | $ 975.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SDM865 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.46 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.68 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 3 is a little bit better than OPPO Find X3 Neo, having an 81.2 score against 76. Galaxy Note 3's design is a little lighter than the OPPO Find X3 Neo, but it's a little thicker and was released many years before. Both of these phones include Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Note 3 has the older 5.0 version while OPPO Find X3 Neo has Android 11 version.
The OPPO Find X3 Neo has a slightly better looking display than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because it has a just a bit higher pixel density, a little bigger screen and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px. OPPO Find X3 Neo features a little bit better hardware performance than Galaxy Note 3, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processor, it also counts with a higher amount of RAM and more cpu cores.
The OPPO Find X3 Neo shoots much better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition, the OPPO Find X3 Neo also has a larger aperture to take better images and video in low light environments, better video frame rate and a back facing camera with a much higher resolution.
The OPPO Find X3 Neo counts with a lot bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. The OPPO Find X3 Neo features a much longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3200mAh.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is also by far the cheapest, making buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.