Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 82.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2013-09-04 | 2021-12-03 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 6.48 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.88 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Black |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 265.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 386 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V/ZA (7 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.46 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.68 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A13 5G is slightly better than the Galaxy Note 3, getting an 82.1 score against 81.2. Although the Galaxy A13 5G is extremely newer than Galaxy Note 3, it is a bit thicker and heavier. Both devices in this review come with Android operating system, but the Galaxy A13 5G has newer 12 version and Galaxy Note 3 has Android 5.0 version, counting with some additional features and improved performance.
Galaxy Note 3 features a much sharper display than Galaxy A13 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher screen density and a better resolution of 1920 x 1080. The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has a much bigger storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A13 5G, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy Note 3 also has an external SD slot that admits up to 64 GB.
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 counts with a bit more powerful CPU than Galaxy A13 5G, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and a lower number of cores , it also counts with a GPU. The Samsung Galaxy A13 5G has a way better battery performance than Galaxy Note 3, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Galaxy A13 5G features a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same (Full HD) video quality, the Galaxy A13 5G also has a bigger aperture to capture better low light captures and a back facing camera with way more MP.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.