Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 | Android 14 |
| 2013-09-04 | 2023-12-16 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Blue Black and Light Blue |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 265.00 | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ (6 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.03 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.46 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.68 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 3 has a global score of 81.2, which is a bit better than Galaxy A15 5G's 77.4 general score. Both of these phones include Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Note 3 has older 5.0 version while Galaxy A15 5G has Android 14. Galaxy Note 3's construction has the same thickness than Galaxy A15 5G, but it is lighter.
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has a little sharper display than Galaxy A15 5G, although it has a just a little lower pixel density, a bit worse 1920 x 1080 resolution and a quite smaller display. Galaxy Note 3 counts with a lot better processing power than Galaxy A15 5G, because although it has 1 GB less RAM and less processing cores , it also counts with a graphics processing unit.
The Galaxy A15 5G has a much greater storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Note 3, because it has an external SD slot that holds up to 1000 GB and 128 GB internal storage capacity. Galaxy A15 5G features a way better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G features a bit better camera than Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same (Full HD) video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G also has a larger aperture to capture better photos in low-light situations and a back facing camera with lot more MP.
Galaxy Note 3 is more expensive than the Galaxy A15 5G, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.