Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 | Android 11 |
| 2013-09-04 | 2021-06-24 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.16 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Gray, Mint, Violet and White |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 265.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 386 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.46 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.68 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G has a score of 84.6, which is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy Note 3's 81.2 score. Samsung Galaxy A22 5G is a extremely newer device than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, but it's heavier and a bit thicker. These devices work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G has the newer 11 version while Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has Android 5.0.
The Galaxy Note 3 has a bit better processor than Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and an inferior number of cores (although they are faster), it also counts with a GPU. Galaxy Note 3 has just a bit better looking display than Galaxy A22 5G, although it has a quite lower pixel number per screen inch, a quite lower resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels and a little smaller screen.
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G counts with a much bigger memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G also has a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB. The Galaxy A22 5G features a way better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because it has a 56 percent greater battery capacity.
Galaxy A22 5G has a bit better camera than Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same (Full HD) video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Galaxy A22 5G also has a camera with much more mega-pixels and a larger diafragm aperture to capture better photos in low light environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.