Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 | Android 14 |
| 2013-09-04 | 2023-12-11 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 265.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.46 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.68 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 3 has an overall score of 81.2, which is slightly better than Galaxy A25 5G's overall score of 79.9. These devices use Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Note 3 has the older 5.0 version while Galaxy A25 5G has Android 14 version. Galaxy Note 3's design has the same thickness than Galaxy A25 5G, but it is lighter.
The Galaxy Note 3 counts with a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy A25 5G, although it has a little smaller display, a bit lower 1920 x 1080 resolution and a little bit lower amount of pixels per inch in the screen. The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has a much better storage capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy Note 3, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 1 TB and 128 GB internal storage.
The Galaxy Note 3 counts with a much faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and less cpu cores , it also counts with a graphics co-processor. The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G counts with a much better battery duration than Galaxy Note 3, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3200mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G takes much better pictures and videos than Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G also has a larger sensor which offers a higher image and video quality, a larger aperture for better low-light photography and videos and a way more MP back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.