Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 79.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 | Android 14 |
| 2013-09-04 | 2024-03-11 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | -- |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 265.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.46 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.68 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 3 has a general score of 81.2, which is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G's score of 79.4. The Galaxy Note 3 design is somewhat lighter than the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, but it's just a little thicker and was released 11 years before. Both of these phones work with Android OS, but Galaxy Note 3 has the older 5.0 version while Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has Android 14 version.
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has a slightly better looking display than Galaxy A35 5G, although it has a bit lower pixels density, a bit worse resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels and a bit smaller display. The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has a bit more memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy Note 3, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 64 GB more internal storage capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 counts with a lot better performance than Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has 4 less processing cores (although faster) and less RAM memory, it also counts with an additional GPU. The Galaxy A35 5G has a way better battery lifetime than Galaxy Note 3, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Galaxy A35 5G has a better camera than Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Galaxy A35 5G also has a larger camera aperture, a way larger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a much higher resolution back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.