Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 | -- |
| 2013-09-04 | 2017-01-13 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 5.75 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.61 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 265.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Mali-T830 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.46 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.68 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is just a bit better than Galaxy A5 (2017), getting an 81.2 score against 75.8. Even being the best cellphone we compare here, the Samsung Galaxy Note 3 body is a lot older, a little heavier and just a little thicker than Galaxy A5 (2017). Samsung Galaxy Note 3 features a bit better CPU than Galaxy A5 (2017), because although it has a lower number of cores (but faster), and they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Samsung Galaxy Note 3 also counts with an additional graphics processing unit.
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 counts with a little more vivid screen than Galaxy A5 (2017), because although it has a just a little lower pixel density, and they both have exactly the same 1920 x 1080px resolution, the Samsung Galaxy Note 3 also counts with a bit bigger display. Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has a little bit more storage for applications and games than Galaxy A5 (2017), because although it has a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 64 GB against 256 GB, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has 3200mAh of battery capacity. The Galaxy Note 3 features just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not good for shooting photos or videos in low-light situations and a lesser mega pixels resolution camera, it also counts with a much better 3840x2160 video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.