Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 | -- |
| 2013-09-04 | 2019-03-15 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 265.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.46 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A50 is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy Note 3, having a global score of 83.8 against 81.2. The Samsung Galaxy A50 construction is much newer, just a little bit thinner and just a bit lighter than Samsung Galaxy Note 3. Galaxy Note 3 and Samsung Galaxy A50 both feature quite similar CPUs, because although the Samsung Galaxy A50 has doesn't have a graphics co-processor, it also counts with more processing cores and a higher amount of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 features a slightly better looking screen than Galaxy A50, although it has a just a little lower count of pixels per inch of display, a little bit lower resolution of 1920 x 1080 and a bit smaller screen. The Galaxy A50 features a lot bigger storage to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because it has a SD card slot that allows up to 512 GB and more internal storage capacity.
Galaxy A50 takes a bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 1920x1080 video quality, the Galaxy A50 also has a way larger aperture to capture better photography and videos in low-light situations, a larger camera sensor capturing better quality photographs and a camera with a much better resolution.
The Galaxy A50 features better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3200mAh.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, Samsung Galaxy A50 is also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.