Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2013-09-04 | 2019-04-26 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 265.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.46 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A70, having an 81.2 score against 76.9. These phones work with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has the previous 5.0 version while Samsung Galaxy A70 has Android 10. Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is a much older and a little bit thicker device than the Samsung Galaxy A70, but Samsung could make it a bit lighter anyway.
The Galaxy Note 3 counts with a bit faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy A70, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and lesser CPU cores , it also counts with a GPU. The Galaxy Note 3 features a much better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A70, although it has a little lower resolution of 1920 x 1080, a little smaller screen and a little bit worse display pixels density.
Galaxy A70 features a much bigger memory to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because it has a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB and 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Samsung Galaxy A70 counts with a much longer battery life than Galaxy Note 3, because it has a 41% more battery capacity.
Galaxy Note 3 takes a lot better photos and videos than Galaxy A70, although it has a lot smaller aperture and a tinier back camera sensor capturing less light and duller colors, they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, Galaxy Note 3 is also cheap compared to the other phone, making this phone an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.