Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 | Android 7.0 Nougat |
| 2013-09-04 | 2017-06-20 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 6.17 x 3.10 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 265.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 386 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | MediaTek Helio P20 MT6757 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 16 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Mali-T880 MP2 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.46 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.68 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 3 has a global score of 81.2, which is just a bit better than Galaxy J7 Max's 76.1 overall score. Even though the Galaxy Note 3 is much older and a little thicker than the Galaxy J7 Max, it's construction is still just a little lighter. Both of these phones have Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy Note 3 has older 5.0 version and Galaxy J7 Max has Android 7.0 Nougat.
The Galaxy Note 3 and the Samsung Galaxy J7 Max count with quite similar CPUs, because although the Samsung Galaxy J7 Max has doesn't have a graphics processor, it also counts with a greater amount of RAM memory and more processing cores. The Galaxy Note 3 counts with a much better screen than Galaxy J7 Max. Both have the same pixels density, a same size screen and exactly the same resolution of 1920 x 1080px.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 counts with a slightly better memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy J7 Max, because although it has an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 64 GB against 256 GB, it also counts with 64 GB internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy Note 3 takes a little bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy J7 Max, because although it has a much smaller diafragm aperture which is not nice for low-light photos and video, and they both have a back-facing camera with a 13 mega-pixels, the Samsung Galaxy Note 3 also counts with a lot higher (4K) video definition.
The Galaxy J7 Max features a bit longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because it has a 3% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.